From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 02:24:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3567416A4CE for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 02:24:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EE943D46 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 02:24:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C3695128F; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:29:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:29:39 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dejan Lesjak Message-ID: <20041201022939.GA4048@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041129195108.GC8315@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412010158.03269.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20041201010904.GA81098@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412010321.11891.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200412010321.11891.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [ports-i386@dosirak.kr.freebsd.org: zh-chinput2-1.3.1 failed on i386 5] X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 02:24:26 -0000 --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:21:11AM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > Ah, I see. Then how about this: there appear to be basicaly two cathegori= es of=20 > breaks. First are the ones that can be commited even before xorg upgrade= =20 > (like rosegarden and zh-chinput2). Rosegarden is maintained by ports so I= =20 > thought of waiting a day or so if someone objects or comes up with better= =20 > idea, and then commit it. (and during writing this it seems that fix for= =20 > libxklavier was commited). I intended to notify maintainers of the ones t= hat=20 > are maintained and if we don't hear from them until the time xorg is read= y=20 > for commit I can commit them separately, but at the same time (if they=20 > respond earlier, the commits can also be done earlier). > Another ones are closely related to commit (like ja-kdrill) since their p= list=20 > changes as consequence of not installing html man pages. These should be= =20 > commited together with upgrade and I can merge those into the patch and= =20 > notify maintainers that this will be done. > Would that be acceptable? That's fine. You don't even need to wait to commit to the unmaintained ports, if you don't want to. Kris --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBrSyTWry0BWjoQKURAhj5AJ0QdOfwMdP5x2uGotnEGm4fx6E+ewCg953X GmIG5mjXGA4ez37Zu20qVnI= =9QK9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--