From nobody Sat May 24 15:38:21 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4b4R4z3qx4z5wZHP; Sat, 24 May 2025 15:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.145]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4b4R4y4WpNz3LYY; Sat, 24 May 2025 15:38:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm3 header.b=N09XdQU+; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=avccLXSz; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 202.12.124.145 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-08.internal (phl-compute-08.phl.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A36611400AB; Sat, 24 May 2025 11:38:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-08.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 24 May 2025 11:38:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1748101105; x=1748187505; bh=Tj03K2y028 lSEW7JxrhG+CcRZY2KdhR5pwRGr43TYfM=; b=N09XdQU+m/UnRk5dAijJE08bvi PVPOHhFR/eVhyDsB0m8WoDJwFYxz6oazEAGxsj4P9NRliXn7V4p4zlCR8tiPCX2x KFDy54k2nCQfNaNEzfB2cIRlWVPuTJZ1dp3ymQ2y2HNHvEVE89iVCZIMLd0ccIGC W3vKrvL0pMHFdUxgpYJM55rrMqKT7f8fAjHDlQHj+JW3kCz4umblm6EQ1LYtz5UC 2u4r5Y2iGj/5ArhksmJDTGI9qoZEg2qZ5HKiVT8jbf7YigdWWhkM/6VQ46nTR1cv CzdfXWH7XSiKlv4aOnMHEkqi1ahq4t6CWHfLwXCTi8s475ziFY6gjSwFSA0Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1748101105; x=1748187505; bh=Tj03K2y028lSEW7JxrhG+CcRZY2KdhR5pwR Gr43TYfM=; b=avccLXSze0zX66FlKxU1uW/48dchPN2P3bDEOmrmEqSJcza+t0C ee2CnVTBLoEIxKqWM/w6ZN3/59Xm9J0R9vAmVYhkFwBkTdJY+3+l0EOJqWJ5nsLj xXqSgEpO6WuRHJ+VY3LqDCZ6ojriKjzBvf6UpDmsoO0NPQwbU8FmM1mF12RY0AQ6 WVEJqm1CWCPdskRu67DPHgdd4CpyibVcykZ7I0whqqzNkSqxyeY1cZeqhnFZiMcK h6F83QBX1yadY7RvyTtRQWOVyfETF+HhekY2p2GFqgryIbgzQ22GWof/40LtW9uh ZoAcwzBTj/mhAqgWDWwYQ1110drcjrOXJBA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgdduvddutdculddtuddrgeefvddrtd dtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggft fghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftd dtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhf gggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehvohhiugcuoehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeggfehhfejjeekteeufeehfefhgeejgfeliedvhedv ffffhffgiedtvddtgfehueenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghenucevlh hushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehvohhiugesfhdq mhdrfhhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeehpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtth hopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhnvghtsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepphgs lhhokhessghsugegrghllhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehrohhnrghlugdqlhhishhtsh eskhhlohhprdifshdprhgtphhtthhopehnvghtsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgpdhrtghp thhtohepshhtrggslhgvsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 24 May 2025 11:38:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 16:38:21 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Peter Blok , Ronald Klop , net@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net.link.bridge.member_ifaddrs has landed in stable/14 Message-ID: References: <1456605763.8629.1748007827309@localhost> <187BDEF1-CA44-4BF4-B6F3-3CEEEDA8F802@bsd4all.org> List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4b4R4y4WpNz3LYY X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.979]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.60)[0.605]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:202.12.124.128/27]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[202.12.124.145:from]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org,net@freebsd.org,stable@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+] On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 06:39:48PM +0100, ivy@FreeBSD.org wrote: >this should be fixed by https://reviews.freebsd.org/D50477, as long as >you have allow_llz_overlap set to 0 (which is the default, and there's >almost never any reason to change it). Just built against your patch and it's all working, TYVM. FreeBSD 14.3-STABLE #2 stable/14-n271551-4e0a5fd7b608-dirty: Sat May 24 15:16:54 BST 2025 also: net.link.bridge.allow_llz_overlap: 0 net.link.bridge.member_ifaddrs="0" my ifconfig_em0 looks like this: ifconfig_em0="media 1000baseT mediaopt full-duplex up" bridge0: ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.1.2/24 addm em0 addm tap0 addm tap1" speed tests against a freebsd vm installed on tap0 showed no significant speed reduction compared to baremetal, which is fantastic. This sort of thing I was looking at back in October last year with iperf3, when freebsd guests had sometimes less than half the expected throughput. Next up to test is a -current system with many VMs. --