From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 6 7:17:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A88337B402 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 07:17:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id g06FHQl13176; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:17:26 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (mark@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g05BL9V52739; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 13:21:09 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200201051121.g05BL9V52739@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Question to PAM hackers References: <20020104075611.GA11377@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020104075611.GA11377@nagual.pp.ru> ; from "Andrey A. Chernov" "Fri, 04 Jan 2002 10:56:11 +0300." Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 13:21:08 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Is there a way (i.e. interface function) to check if particular PAM module > loaded, inside application? No. Annd nor should there be. The authentication process with PAM means that the authentication policy (including which modules are loaded) are none of the applications damn business :-) M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message