Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 04:12:22 +0100 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Congrats on CURRENT 5/1 SNAP... Message-ID: <23827.832648342@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 May 1996 20:05:46 PDT." <Pine.GSO.3.92.960520200020.391D-100000@hamby1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jake Hamby wrote in message ID <Pine.GSO.3.92.960520200020.391D-100000@hamby1>: > On Mon, 20 May 1996, Gary Palmer wrote: > > Some points: > > > > 1) After a quick examination of /bin, the majority of the binaries > > there I'd like to see stay. The couple that I don't quite > > understand being there (such as `rmail') probably need to stay > > there for backwards compatability. > Okay, but there are already copies of some of these in /stand! Also, if > nothing else, I would like a shared version of /bin/sh and /bin/csh for > faster interactive use, with a static /sbin/sh for boot-up scripts only. > Comments? A lot of people, myself included, tend to blow /stand away once installed. There isn't a lot of need for it generally once the machine is installed. I must admit I will not argue if you move csh from /bin. I don't see much use for it myself. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23827.832648342>