From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jun 10 09:01:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA03033 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:01:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from manchester.genrad.com (x191.genrad.co.uk [195.99.3.191] (may be forged)) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA02981 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:01:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swindellsr@genrad.co.uk) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806101601.JAA02981@hub.freebsd.org> Received: from CDP275.uk.genrad.com by manchester.genrad.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1458.49) id M4QGHQ01; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 17:00:39 +0100 From: Robert Swindells To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <18591.897488992@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: Anyone running the linux emulation as an LKM under 2.2-stable? Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >So, can I infer from this that there are people who are _currently_ >using the Linux LKM, do not compile their kernels with COMPAT_LINUX, >and things are just fine with them in 2.2-stable? I'd just like to have >this confirmed by *one* person since the LKM used to work fine for me >too, up until about a week or two ago. :-) I'll cvsup and try it. I use acroread and acl by loading the LKM, but I can live without either if it breaks. Robert Swindells ---------------------------------- Robert Swindells - GenRad Ltd. rjs@genrad.co.uk - Work rjs@fdy2.demon.co.uk - Home To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message