From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu May 13 15:59:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from nwcst021.netaddress.usa.net (nwcst021.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.24.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE2A315210 for ; Thu, 13 May 1999 15:59:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jesus.monroy@usa.net) Received: (qmail 29562 invoked by uid 60001); 13 May 1999 22:59:49 -0000 Message-ID: <19990513225949.29561.qmail@nwcst021.netaddress.usa.net> Received: from 204.68.24.21 by nwcst021 via web-mailer(M3.0.0.118) on Thu May 13 22:59:49 GMT 1999 Date: 13 May 99 15:59:49 PDT From: Jesus Monroy To: Jordan K.Hubbard , Daniel C.Sobral Subject: Re: [Re: Ombudsman (sp? :) ] Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (M3.0.0.118) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > Could we have an ombudsman list? Ie, a mailing address for complains > > about us? While I fear it might get spammed with Brett Glass > > messages, I'm concerned that there isn't any obvious place for users > > to express their dissatisfactions. > = > Hmmmm. You mean like complaints@freebsd.org or something? Is it also > OK if nobody from core actually subscribes to it? :-) > = Sorry I'm late on the discussion. First, I think this is a good idea, but I think it needs to have some kind of redering process where this information is used. Otherwise, it's just a blackhole. :-) --- IN that context, it is the BSD that should be considered, not the prefix. http://minnie.cs.adfa.oz.au/cgi-bin/newsread?34858 ____________________________________________________________________ Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message