From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 16:00:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B7937B492 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 16:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx8.mail.ru (mx8.mail.ru [194.67.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAB343FB1 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 16:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from webdenis@inbox.ru) Received: from [80.82.39.159] (port=49155 helo=671.asx.dial.vsi.ru) by mx8.mail.ru with esmtp id 19lGDK-000LvN-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 03:00:02 +0400 From: WebDenis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 02:59:11 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308090259.11068.webdenis@inbox.ru> X-Spam: Not detected Subject: I think that FreeBSD 5.1 bad version.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 23:00:35 -0000 How do u think, FreeBSD 5.1 better then 4.8 stable? I think that all of my problem was only from 5.1 And i think that 4.8 better then 5.1.... maybe I think wrong? Best Regards, Denis(Russia).