From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 00:54:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA88937B401; Wed, 7 May 2003 00:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5960743F75; Wed, 7 May 2003 00:54:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0555.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.44.45] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19DJkg-0003M3-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 00:54:12 -0700 Message-ID: <3EB8BB11.65E8A1E7@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 00:51:45 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <011901c31390$7aef5730$0300000a@antalus> <20030505225826.G666@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <1052215193.41902.130.camel@watchtower.office.parksmediagroup.com> <3EB8B7FD.AFBE8EC4@mindspring.com> <20030507004857.I5620@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4c2a62f9b75aeaaf1930362cb195cbaf5a7ce0e8f8d31aa3f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridge config in /etc/rc (patch) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 07:54:13 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > /usr/local/etc/rc.d has already been suggested, and it's a direction I'd > like to see us move in. Because the ordering of dependencies is > non-trivial, I'm not sure having more than one such directory is a > realistic target atm, but at least having one is definitely doable. Thought of that, but I was fearful about name collisions (i.e. everyone and their dog wanting "bridge" or "net"). It's probably not a big deal, since similarly named things would most likely have similar functions... one can hope. 8-). -- Terry