From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 08:12:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237E816A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 08:12:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from magidesign.com (w178.z064001046.atl-ga.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.46.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962FA43F75 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 08:11:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from payne@magidesign.com) Received: from magidesign.com ([64.25.7.78])hB5FvGP4029637 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:57:18 -0500 Message-ID: <3FD0AE4B.7020207@magidesign.com> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:11:55 -0500 From: Payne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030912 Thunderbird/0.3a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD Version... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:12:01 -0000 Hi, I am wondering why there was 4.9 release if the newest one it 5.1. Whick is better I am currently on 5.1. It's a little confusing. Well there be a 4.10 and 5.2 release at the same time? Payne