Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Dec 2011 17:51:21 +0100
From:      Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org>
To:        Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Wipe other file systems when creating new UFS
Message-ID:  <CAOfDtXM_gemj%2B1Y-kCNDHKnYGfuuA75TX91veVyUfgS2Q3pWiw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201112091838.pB9IcpUe038205@chez.mckusick.com>
References:  <20111208134307.GA5266@thorin> <201112091838.pB9IcpUe038205@chez.mckusick.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/12/9 Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>:
> Generally speaking, I am in agreement with what you are trying to do.
> However, you should not get rid of the check for (and the erasing of)
> the UFS1 superblock. By default, UFS2 puts its superblock at an offset
> of 64K from the beginning of the partition. You then eraseup to 512K
> after that point which is reasonable since on a UFS2 filesystem the
> first 64K can be used for the bootstrap. However, UFS1 places its
> superblock at 8K from the beginning of the partition. You will not
> wipe it out if it exists and its existence (if it has not been
> overwritten by a bootstrap) can be quite problematic. Hence the
> current code that checks for its existence, and only if found its
> being wiped out.

Thanks for the tip, I'll prepare a new patch that includes this.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOfDtXM_gemj%2B1Y-kCNDHKnYGfuuA75TX91veVyUfgS2Q3pWiw>