From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Oct  8 01:00:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA00925
          for stable-outgoing; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 01:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable)
Received: from helium.vapornet.com (root@helium.vapornet.com [208.202.126.112])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA00915
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 01:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from john@helium.vapornet.com)
Received: from argon.vapornet.com (vapornet.xnet.com [205.243.141.107]) by helium.vapornet.com (8.8.7/VaporServer-v3.0+SpamNot) with ESMTP id DAA06411; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 03:00:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by argon.vapornet.com (8.8.7/VaporClient-1.1)
	id DAA05325; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 03:00:12 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 03:00:12 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199710080800.DAA05325@argon.vapornet.com>
From: John Preisler <john@helium.vapornet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "C. Stephen Gunn" <csg@wintek.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Netatalk problems with 2.2.5-BETA?
In-Reply-To: <199710080336.DAA02328@mail.wintek.com>
References: <199710080336.DAA02328@mail.wintek.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


the latest build magically broke netatalk so i did a send-pr on it but
have heard nothing back.  netatalk is definately broked for now in the
2.2 tree.


-jrp




C. Stephen Gunn writes:
 > 
 > Are there any known problem with netatalk and 2.2.5-BETA? I just tried
 > to bring up 1.4b2 from the ports to no avail. I also tried applying
 > the patches available for 3.0-CURRENT which didn't work either.
 > 
 >  - Steve
 >