From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 18:09:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F888F6; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B302167; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4BA9B94A; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 14:09:16 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: svn commit: r267248 - head/usr.sbin/acpi/acpiconf Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:43:52 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201406090154.s591s18T091857@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201406090154.s591s18T091857@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201406091143.52910.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:09:16 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:09:18 -0000 On Sunday, June 08, 2014 9:54:01 pm Eitan Adler wrote: > Author: eadler > Date: Mon Jun 9 01:54:00 2014 > New Revision: 267248 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/267248 > > Log: > acpiconf(8): document 'k' option > > Add missing documentation for the 'k' option based on reading the source > code. Might want some explicit language to say that users should probably never use this option directly. -- John Baldwin