From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 29 8:58:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from majordomo2.umd.edu (majordomo2.umd.edu [128.8.10.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE88137BC82 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:58:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from howardjp@wam.umd.edu) Received: from rac9.wam.umd.edu (root@rac9.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.149]) by majordomo2.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05504 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:58:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac9.wam.umd.edu (sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac9.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA26180 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rac9.wam.umd.edu (howardjp@localhost) by rac9.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26175 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200006291558.LAA26175@rac9.wam.umd.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: rac9.wam.umd.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: /etc/security -> /etc/periodic/security ? Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:58:04 -0400 From: James Howard Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Will we be seeing a move in this direction towards a more configurable security script? Is anyone planning it? I am porting the scripts to Linux and will hold off on security if nothing is being planned or make the changes myself. I just do not want to duplicate efforts. Also, I found a bug with a patch in conf/19567. Please apply :) Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message