From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  9 18:56:27 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7958D106564A;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2010 18:56:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from shaun@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from dione.picobyte.net (81-86-230-94.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.230.94])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8CB08FC18;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2010 18:56:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from charon.picobyte.net (charon.picobyte.net
	[IPv6:2001:770:15d::fe03])
	by dione.picobyte.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4770FB876;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2010 18:32:22 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:32:22 +0000
From: Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org>
To: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20100309183221.GA90364@charon.picobyte.net>
References: <47B3280E-2609-476D-92EA-BC940C8C49D3@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47B3280E-2609-476D-92EA-BC940C8C49D3@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (FreeBSD i386)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Ports with same name
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:56:27 -0000

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:23:51AM -0500, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277
> we have two ports with the same name:
> 
> Port:	gag-2.9
> Path:	/usr/ports/security/gag
> Info:	A stacheldraht (DOS attack) agent detector

[...]

> Port:	gag-4.9
> Path:	/usr/ports/sysutils/gag
> Info:	Graphical Boot Manager

[...]

> I am looking for some advice on whats the best course of action to deal with this.
> 
> My gut feeling is that sysutils/gag should remain the same and that security/gag should be
> renamed to security/gag-stacheldraht.
> 
> Anyone vehemently opposed to this?

The new name sounds reasonable, but it would probably make sense just to
change LATEST_LINK rather than "move" the port.

-- 
Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin
of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson