Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 15:01:14 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Thomas Gellekum <tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de> Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Extending bsd.port.mk diagnostics when some of the patches fail to apply [patch for review] Message-ID: <39B38F0A.B2225774@FreeBSD.org> References: <39B377B3.B10E748C@FreeBSD.org> <kqog241i9v.fsf@cip12.melaten.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Gellekum wrote: > Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm sure all hardcore porters are aware of this problem: when you are trying to > > update some port and not all patches applied cleanly there is no easy way to > > figure from error message which patches have been applied and which one has > > not. The following patch is expected to make a life of porter a bit easier by > > extending verbosity of error messages in this case (it doesn't affect anything > > if all patches were applied cleanly). > > What happened to PATCH_DEBUG? Nothing, but it may be silly to have all this debug info displayed each time even when all goes OK. My patch is less intrusive - it displays debug info *only* when something bad happened. Also I believe it would benefit bento logs. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39B38F0A.B2225774>