From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 27 00:26:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B524316A41F for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:26:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com (lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com [68.99.120.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A2743D49 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:26:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com) Received: from dns1 ([64.58.171.82]) by lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050827002623.BAUF3947.lakecmmtao04.coxmail.com@dns1>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:26:23 -0400 From: Vizion To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:22:25 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <43062A01.5000208@phreaker.net> <20050821125806.4b06a022@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20050826205909.GA15820@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20050826205909.GA15820@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508261722.26131.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> Cc: Ion-Mihai Tetcu , goatse@phreaker.net, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: is azureus finally okay? X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:26:23 -0000 On Friday 26 August 2005 13:59, the author Dan Nelson contributed to the dialogue on- Re: is azureus finally okay?: >In the last episode (Aug 21), Ion-Mihai Tetcu said: >> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:50:41 +0200 anon wrote: >> > I have used many bittorrent programs, Currently im using bittornado >> > after using rtorrent (great program but crashing all the time) But >> > Bittornado doesnt relly have all the good functions like a torrent >> > queue for example... >> > >> > Anyway I have had freeBSD 5.3 and my runnings with azureus have >> > always been troublesome, because azureus+freeBSD arent the best >> > friends... last time I tried with 2.2.0.0 and jdk-14 it didnt work, >> > only time it worked was when I tried an CVS nightbuild, with an old >> > azureus version, like 1.4 ... but that crashed once in a while >> > too... >> > >> > So im just wondering 1) is azureus, latest version from ports >> > finally hassle/bug/crash free? and therefore 1 b) is jdk 1.5 >> > finally working and okay? not just beta, or that I have to use >> > linux 1.5 java >> >> Right now azureus won't compile because of the new eclipse version. > >I'm not sure why azureus requires eclipse at all. I have a homemade >port at http://dan.allantgroup.com/FreeBSD/swt-dan.tar.gz that builds a >standalone libswt, and I just use the jar file provided on the azureus >web site. There are no source patches in the current azureus port, so >it doesn't really make any sense to have to recompile it. jdk 1.5 runs fine on Freebsd 5.3 I have been running it since first release with no problem. David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing bound for Europe via Panama Canal after completing engineroom refit.