From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 31 07:09:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682B716A4DD for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hbruinsma@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF32443D53 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:09:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hbruinsma@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so513200wxd for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:09:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Abz+abmRCCYfIwA4DNOGS0EkBXgAkCo6NOPeGX0ZWNSTdluFkrLoQdFNjpBvh2dPkKvx2exuB0ItfK3ARKv20Q96ssQB3Turp9Oi9q/KRWsHihGObw8r8z5r8awI/j1DQIncYQhdwz12u8cVxOG0VaXupBs5fUTo0WcYyuVU7I0= Received: by 10.90.117.15 with SMTP id p15mr86922agc; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.56.15 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48087f160608310007g3a20aab8oc13d9c2847f7222c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:07:55 +0200 From: "Hendrik Bruinsma" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060830135428.U95055@beck.quonix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060830135428.U95055@beck.quonix.net> Subject: Re: Question about a high load BIND server setup... X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:09:45 -0000 On 8/30/06, John Von Essen wrote: > Would something like djbdns really help? I can switch, but can't do it for > at least a week while we wait for new hardware. > > Thanks > John I would realy use djbdns. Memory usage and load it much lower then Bind. We switched from Bind to djbdns in march, and now it looks like the machine almost do nothing! No high load, nor strange memory usage! If you ask my, i'dd realy switch do djbdns. But that won't help for the week to come. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Hendrik Bruinsma