From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 10:14:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33B5106566C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi@bsdcrew.de) Received: from bsdcrew.de (duro.unixfreunde.de [85.214.90.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A94C8FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bsdcrew.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4B6774AF56; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:14:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:14:08 +0200 From: Martin Wilke To: David Southwell Message-ID: <20090915101407.GA58780@bsdcrew.de> References: <200909151105.27983.david@vizion2000.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909151105.27983.david@vizion2000.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/138835: Python compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:14:10 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David sorry but stop your agressive blaming here, first you come not without any more infos only it failed secound we are all humons and do sometimes mistakes so, now show me your 'make showconfig" and "uname -a" Thx! On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:05:27AM +0100, David Southwell wrote: > As reported by Ralph Kenyon > > > >On 2009-09-15T10:08:52+0100, David Southwell wrote: > > > I want to understand why bug reports get closed prematurely and without > any > > > discussion with the original person submitting the report. > > ... > > > > Yrs frustrated > > > David Southwell > > >ps the PR link is: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138835 > > >(ports/138835: Python compile failure) > > >I am wondering the same thing. extra-patch-setup.py is wrong. miwi's > >"can't confirm" post in ports/138835 doesn't even show the patch being > >applied. > > >Here is the rejects file: > > >*************** > >*** 1273,1279 **** > ) > libraries = [] > > - elif platform in ('freebsd4', 'freebsd5', 'freebsd6', 'freebsd7', > 'freebsd8'): > # FreeBSD's P1003.1b semaphore support is very experimental > # and has many known problems. (as of June 2008) > macros = dict( # FreeBSD > --- 1277,1283 ---- > ) > libraries = [] > > + elif platform in ('freebsd4', 'freebsd5', 'freebsd6', 'freebsd7', > 'freebsd8', 'freebsd9'): > # FreeBSD's P1003.1b semaphore support is very experimental > # and has many known problems. (as of June 2008) > macros = dict( # FreeBSD > > > >Kenyon Ralph > >End of signed message > > This bug now has a new PR > Link is: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138837 > - -- +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ | PGP : 0xB1E6FCE9 | Jabber : miwi(at)BSDCrew.de | | Skype : splash_111 | Mail : miwi(at)FreeBSD.org | +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ | Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest! | +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqvaO8ACgkQdLJIhLHm/OkC+QCfTJzBNF/I+tvYV4nb88Ro+Nf5 8bcAniJ0J0Bbcggd6Tv4sHecqs5mTd+6 =0sgD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----