From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 19 20:28:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D62106564A for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from amailer.gwdg.de (amailer.gwdg.de [134.76.10.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43898FC0A for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:28:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from p578b68b8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.139.104.184] helo=lt011.nfv) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lvdcl-00048W-22; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:28:23 +0200 Message-ID: <49EB8968.3040004@gwdg.de> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:28:24 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090404) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov References: <49E98C97.9080602@gwdg.de> <10766735@ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <10766735@ipt.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [SOLVED] acroread8 does not print any more X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:28:58 -0000 On 19.04.2009 20:06 (UTC+2), Boris Samorodov wrote: > Rainer Hurling writes: > >> Since I am using the new linux emulator f8 I am not able to print with >> acroread8 any more. I get this behaviour on three different >> systems. The following message does appear in acroread: >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> Beim Drucken ist folgender Fehler aufgetreten... >> '/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.6" not found, >> required by "libgcc_s.so.1"' >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Does anyone else see this error? >> >> I would suppose that /compat/linux/lib/libc.so.6 has to be used, but >> acroread is looking at /usr/local/lib/compat/libc.so.6. Any >> suggestions what could be wrong? >> >> Let me know if I can give more information or test something. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Rainer Hurling >> >> >> P.S.: I am running FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT with linux_base-f8 >> >> sysctl compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 >> >> /etc/make.conf >> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 >> OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 >> >> >> #ls -d /var/db/pkg/linux* >> linux-f8-alsa-lib-1.0.15 >> linux-f8-jpeg-6b >> linux-flashplugin-9.0r159 >> linux-f8-atk-1.20.0 >> linux-f8-libsigc++20-2.0.18 >> linux-kmod-compat-20080408 >> linux-f8-cairo-1.4.14 >> linux-f8-libxml2-2.7.2 >> linux-nvu-1.0_1 >> linux-f8-dri-7.0.2 >> linux-f8-openssl-0.9.8b >> linux-realplayer-10.0.9.809.20070726 >> linux-f8-expat-2.0.1 >> linux-f8-pango-1.18.4 >> linux-scim-gtk-fc8-1.4.7_1 >> linux-f8-fontconfig-2.4.2 >> linux-f8-png-1.2.22 >> linux-scim-libs-fc8-1.4.7_2 >> linux-f8-gtk2-2.12.8 >> linux-f8-tiff-3.8.2 >> linux_base-f8-8_11 > > Since you have two linux-scim-* ports it seems to me that you > upgraded to linux -f8- ports without reading /usr/ports/UPDATING > and there may be some unneeded remnants at /compat/linux. Can > you follow that procedure and write a followup here? > > BTW, some useful information you may find at emulation@ ML and > my "HEADSUP" message about new linux -f8- ports. > > WBR I deinstalled all linux packages and all dependencies, deleted completely /compat/linux and rebooted. After that I installed acroread, nvidia-driver, linux-flashplugin9 and mplayer again. Interestingly enough the two linux-scim-* ports do excist again! It seems they are needed for acroread8. But now I am able to print with acroread again! So you have been right with unneeded remnants at /compat/linux! When updating my excisting linux_base-f8 at 04/01/2009 to the newer one, I thought it was not neccessary to clean /compat/linux. But obviously it was. Thank you very much for this helpful information, Rainer