From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 22:41:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5241065670; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562F78FC08; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp17 with SMTP id 17so7372058ywp.13 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:41:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QXFOoj7phuQzQAmzI25dFrMqQzEFqei1dxVZfdjlmP0=; b=KJpwficPnHv2DhoCxHN82rSSP/Dl9M1OLZuWPGldBYD7uTB6W5zTRb/UjpEI3wvEjW sdnfwRewD9j+iB+hKtSsGKgHuS0qUdSrb/Y0AYXS+owz6ZCsEbzzs218SamYdnLih9yT Zl2ASzo7fKjhiumVe7GsNj6D/9dLqRM3/2434= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.6.3 with SMTP id j3mr8050480ybi.90.1318285015577; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.145.18 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:16:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E9356A1.9000503@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20111007230336.GB3051@laptop.levsha.me> <20111007164411.554ac9c0.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20111010120419.9cfee3e9.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4E9356A1.9000503@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:16:55 -0700 Message-ID: From: Xin LI To: "Hartmann, O." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Stanislav Sedov , current@freebsd.org, Chris Rees , "portmgr@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ports on 10.0-CURRENT: r226027 is incorrect fix X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:41:23 -0000 On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 10/10/11 21:04, Stanislav Sedov wrote: >> On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100 >> Chris Rees mentioned: >> >>> Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I misse= d >>> something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it. >>> >>> Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of i= ts >>> location? >>> >>> This is a bad solution, please revert it or I will when I get back. We'= re >>> going to end up being asked to support it on ports@ otherwise. >>> >> You certianly missed something, including the rationale behind the portm= gr@ >> descision of not committing to the ports tree (!) bsd.port.mk. =C2=A0Go = find >> some useful work to do like deleting old ports or whatever. =C2=A0You mi= ght want >> to consider deleting all mine ports, as I'm not going to support them an= ymore >> (after you backed out this fix without approval I don't have a working p= orts >> tree anymore on any of my 3 workstations). >> > Hello? Is there need for this barbarian rude tone? Can everyone calm down a little bit, step back and think twice before making reactions? Stop it, as this hurts the project as a family. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die