Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:36:56 +0300
From:      Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Ivo Vachkov <ivo.vachkov@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Net <net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: divert rewrite
Message-ID:  <4D501198.6090901@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D4DFC95.9010804@freebsd.org>
References:  <4D4DCD1E.1050906@freebsd.org>	<AANLkTimtDegcGjzXatEOHjQR9GM_hD29ZiKnkT-zG1_S@mail.gmail.com> <4D4DFC95.9010804@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
06.02.2011 4:42, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 2/5/11 4:09 PM, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> How can I help?
>
> if you have ipv6 connectivity and experience, I have no experience or
> connectivity, with it so
> I'll be coding blind and will need a tester.
> If you have an application for IPV6 testing that would be even better.
> Divert is often used for NAT but that doesn't seem very useful for IPv6 and
> natd doesn't support it anyhow.

Object :)
Divert is really useful way to get packets from firewall to userspace, 
analyse or process them some way and put them back. Really I see no 
other way for this for IPv6. I've tried ng_socket+ng_nat but there is no 
easy way to put a packet back in firewall.

I'm very interested in the process. And I'm ready to help in testing.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D501198.6090901>