From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Mar 1 15:53:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA05002 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 15:53:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA04997 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 15:53:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA01640; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 15:53:16 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703012353.PAA01640@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: The Hermit Hacker cc: "John S. Dyson" , Brian Tao , ken@r74h25.res.gatech.edu, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RSA 56-bit key challenge In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Mar 1997 19:50:44 -0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 01 Mar 1997 15:53:15 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Thats a good question ! I would try it out. Amancio >From The Desk Of The Hermit Hacker : > On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, John S. Dyson wrote: > > > > On Fri, 28 Feb 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > > > > > I also saw Dyson's box PPro 233 Mhz clocking at 352k ... > > > > > I'll be running my machine at nights and when I am away. You > > know that kernel work does necessitate lots of reboots at > > times (especially when I work on it :-)). > > > > I've just added (well, earlier this afternoon) my P133 to the > mix, but was just wondering...would it make any difference if someone > were to create a pgcc/pentium optimized version? > > On top of that...what is this -i option that the client site is > talking about? > >