From owner-freebsd-office@freebsd.org Sat Feb 4 20:29:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF487CD1C9A for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 20:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88EC1ADE for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 20:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B4F31CD1C99; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 20:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: office@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4965CD1C98 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 20:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A40C21ADD for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 20:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v14KTJPn019522 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 20:29:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 216745] devel/boost-libs: atomics are broken with clang 4.0 on i386 Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 20:29:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kib@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: office@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 20:29:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216745 --- Comment #9 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #7) I believe that linux still supports 486. More likely, the define means that gcc on linux defaults to pentium or even to 686. You arguably do not want to run any office package on 486-class machine.=20 Putting aside the clang bug, I think that the practical solution, which also works on existing releases, is to add -march=3Dpentiumpro (or whatever it spelled) to the CFLAGS and declare that port is not supported on any lesser CPU. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=