From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 24 00:27:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E67C16A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:27:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A2C43D4C for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:27:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id A250B148ED; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:27:24 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:27:24 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Dejan Lesjak In-Reply-To: <200501240101.18662.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: Rostislav Krasny Subject: Re: same to the ports/51632 PR but in Xorg 6.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:27:25 -0000 On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > As far as I remember about OPTIONS related problems - they're mostly > with cases when BATCH or PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined (and with what > options would port build in that case) There's a number of (overlapping?) PRs about that that belong to portmgr. This is an area we're interested in pursuing. > I was kinda waiting for OPTIONSng to come... I'll need to have another > look at all these OPTIONS I guess :) The necessary OPTIONS documentation and/or reworks keep getting pushed back because of other, more immediate, crises. This is unfortunate. Also, the main force behind pushing OPTIONSng (eik) seems to have gone missing-in-action at the moment, which complicates things. mcl