From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Sep 24 16:36:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA12605
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 16:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA11856
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eel.dataplex.net by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA04756
  (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for <current@freebsd.org>); Tue, 24 Sep 1996 16:33:38 -0700
Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod [208.2.87.4])
          by eel.dataplex.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA05308;
          Tue, 24 Sep 1996 18:30:13 -0500 (CDT)
X-Sender: rkw@eel.dataplex.net
Message-Id: <v02140b02ae6e1eda1dd5@[208.2.87.4]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 18:30:12 -0500
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth)
Subject: Re: install on {Net,Open}BSD vs install on FreeBSD
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Nate and others,
>        would recognizing but refusing to do anything other than
>issue a warning and succeeding for install -d be acceptible?
>
>"install -d is obsolete, use mtree"

No! I want the functionality to be there.

See Jordan's comment about editing Makefiles.
He is saying the same thing that I am saying.