From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 09:03:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B266C16A408 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 09:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7248C13C489 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 09:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A4720B0; Fri, 11 May 2007 11:03:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C488D20AF; Fri, 11 May 2007 11:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A95875332; Fri, 11 May 2007 11:03:45 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=) To: Kris Kennaway References: <200705102105.27271.blackdragon@highveldmail.co.za> <17987.52037.112351.872442@bhuda.mired.org> <20070511015156.GA77895@xor.obsecurity.org> <86zm4b3h7h.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070511082657.GA24652@xor.obsecurity.org> <86sla33gkm.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070511084026.GA59508@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:03:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070511084026.GA59508@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Fri\, 11 May 2007 04\:40\:27 -0400") Message-ID: <86fy633f66.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Mike Meyer , Ivan Voras Subject: Re: New FreeBSD package system (a.k.a. Daemon Package System (dps)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:03:49 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > Kris Kennaway writes: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > > > Not if you want to use pre-built packages. You made sure of that w= hen > > > > you decided (against my objections) to include .la files in package= s. > > > I have a suspicion you're never going to let that go, but it's not > > > relevant here anyway. Binaries have been hardcoding their build > > > location (e.g. /usr/local) since the dawn of time. > > Most don't. > Assertion without proof. In fact a quick survey shows that 90% of my > /usr/local/bin references /usr/local. I forgot to answer this bit: of course they do, if they were linked in the presence of .la files. Please understand that they are the problem, not the solution. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no