From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 22:01:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A450B16A418 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 22:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman@crackmonkey.us) Received: from crackmonkey.us (crackmonkey.us [70.58.166.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDEC13C49D for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 22:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman@crackmonkey.us) Received: from tarani-bosatsu.dreamtrack.dnsalias.com (cpc1-swin7-0-0-cust216.brhm.cable.ntl.com [::ffff:86.18.88.217]) (AUTH: PLAIN fatman, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by crackmonkey.us with esmtp; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 16:01:24 -0600 id 0017C615.46E31BB9.00000EF6 Message-ID: <46E31B0B.5070802@crackmonkey.us> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:58:35 +0100 From: Adam J Richardson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070830) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <46DECE7F.3000909@fid4.com> <46DEF6D0.8010108@crackmonkey.us> <200709052055.04414.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200709052055.04414.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/ports & portupgrade when only using packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:01:36 -0000 Mel wrote: > On Wednesday 05 September 2007 20:34:56 Adam J Richardson wrote: > >> Well, that's easy... >> >> # rm -R /usr/ports >> >> Saves you a load of disk space, too. The only downside is you get >> slightly older versions of software with packages. >> >> Oh, and don't use portsnap, it'll undo that "rm -R" for you. Using >> "portupgrade -PP" works perfectly well on those rare occasions when I >> want to install a package rather than a port. > > I'm really interested in seeing the output of portupgrade -PP after > rm -R /usr/ports && mkdir /usr/ports. Yes, that might be interesting. I've never tried it. I wonder though, is portupgrade the tool for this? Would not "pkg_add -r whatever" be more appropriate? HtH, Adam J Richardson