From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 09:37:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E5216A4DB for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:37:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDBE43D54 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:37:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8470772DCA; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:37:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816CE72DC9; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:37:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:37:24 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Joan Picanyol In-Reply-To: <20040116165232.GA13397@grummit.biaix.org> Message-ID: <20040116093634.S92448@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <200401151316.24827.eqe@cox.net> <20040116084230.Y92448@carver.gumbysoft.com> <20040116165232.GA13397@grummit.biaix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP and one-process threads (was: Re: problem smp w/ crafty chess engine X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:37:32 -0000 On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Joan Picanyol wrote: > * Doug White [20040116 17:41]: > > Be careful.... FreeBSD doesn't currently schedule different threads of the > > same program on different processors. > Is this true no matter of scheduler/libmap.conf combination? Is it a > planned/required feature? Its a planned feature that'll be implemented by way of KSE. We'd like to have KSE 100% without playing fun CPU games first :) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org