Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 15:57:25 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@u.washington.edu>, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Let's nail some things down. Message-ID: <v04011702b25d350bfc81@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9810281108590.782-100000@s8-37-26.student.washington.edu> References: <36375E2B.7FB07828@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:15 AM -0800 10/28/98, Jason C. Wells wrote: >We will have two logos. "Works with" and "Designed for". Do we agree? > >The test for "Works with" should be a simple "can it run under some sort >of emulation?" (E.G acroread) > >The test for "Designed for" should be "can we build it from source?" or >"did the developer build FreeBSD native binaries?". (E.G. netscape and >all source available ports) > >Do the above statements seem reasonable? If so, let's set them in stone so >we can reduce the number of degrees of freedom in this problem and work >toward a solution. The above seems reasonable to me. Just to add a few degrees of freedom though, Jordan was talking about using new artwork for the next (after 3.0) release of the CD-ROM. Would we want to see what that will be like before designing these logos? (actually he was talking about new artwork for 3.0 release, but the deadline for artwork was upon us too quickly) --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04011702b25d350bfc81>