From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 10 15:41:08 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB40916A47B for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AC913C4B9 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (dialup49.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.49]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-9) with ESMTP id lAAFeDVd002776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:40:36 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAAFeCEK002306; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:40:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lAAFeBJr002305; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:40:11 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:40:11 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: John Smith Message-ID: <20071110154011.GB2060@kobe.laptop> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.936, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.46, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nanobsd, picobsd, tinybsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:41:09 -0000 On 2007-11-09 17:01, John Smith wrote: > Can anybody please explain to my what the differences are between > nanobsd, picobsd and tinybsd. > > They all seem to be doing the same (creating a minimal FreeBSD image > that can be used in embedded systems), or is this not right? What don't you experiment with them, and see? :)