Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:24:44 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl port to select in make.conf Message-ID: <20130903132444.1c956455@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309031219140.34234@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309012229460.76768@woozle.rinet.ru> <52238D66.4020908@passap.ru> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309012301040.76768@woozle.rinet.ru> <20130902232307.44084afd@gumby.homeunix.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309031219140.34234@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 12:22:23 +0400 (MSK) Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, RW wrote: > > > When you install perl (as part of an upgrade or as a dependency) it > > writes the new PERL_VERSION into make.conf. > > Well, all would go well unless it was a *special* make.conf used for > poudriere bulk building instead of system one. > > Well, possibly I should use 'could stop' instead of > definitively-looking 'will stop' I don't see why that would stop perl being updated, the minor and major versions are sufficient to identify the correct port. An out of date patch level in PERL_VERSION could affect dependent ports that have very fine grained version requirements, and need a specific patch level, but that's very rare.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130903132444.1c956455>