From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Jun 13 14:09:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA08944 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Sat, 13 Jun 1998 14:09:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail1.its.rpi.edu (root@mail1.its.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA08935 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 1998 14:09:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail1.its.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA13180 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 1998 17:09:26 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: drosih@pop1.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3582BAB4.A5FEABFA@ibm.net> References: <358200EC.9EDAB78A@softweyr.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 17:13:08 -0400 To: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: copyright Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:45 AM -0700 6/13/98, Don Wilde wrote: > When I requested this mailing list, my working name for it was > 'freebsd-plug', "plug" sounds wrong too... Perhaps freebsd-promotion? > but I guess that wasn't considered stuffy enough. The thing is, freebsd-advocacy would be just about perfect, if it wasn't for the way "advocacy" is used in the naming of usenet newsgroups. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message