Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 10:39:26 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net>, vbox@FreeBSD.org Cc: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r427110 - head/lang/gcc/files [does lang/gcc49 need such too?] Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1612111035520.2333@anthias.pfeifer.com> In-Reply-To: <F621BEFE-FD1E-4164-86D0-4D0DA2EC02C3@dsl-only.net> References: <86C72DB2-B9ED-4512-A88C-BD1D9A23806F@dsl-only.net> <9D54F0CC-F38C-4CCE-BC33-25C1457BD44B@FreeBSD.org> <5C936BA8-6941-431A-B05F-31030816F85C@dsl-only.net> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1611260832560.2407@anthias.pfeifer.com> <487153E5-EF53-4960-9364-23992D7E0F76@dsl-only.net> <F621BEFE-FD1E-4164-86D0-4D0DA2EC02C3@dsl-only.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Mark,
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Mark Millard wrote:
> [Top post of example lack of lang/gcc6-devel vs. lan/gcc6
> substitutability. Context /usr/ports/ at -r428325 (other
> than a few specially controlled items.]
I had another look, and lang/gcc6 and lang/gcc6-devel really are
substitutable in what they provide.
> After installing lang/gcc6-devel something else indirectly
> forced lang/gcc6 to try to build. The attempt failed with:
That means that "something else indirectly forc[ing] lang/gcc6" is
what appears to be going on here. I double checked Mk/bsd.gcc.mk
and failed to find anything (which also would be surprising given
no other reports in the last decade).
vbox@, any ideas?
Gerald
> The specific example turns out to be. . .
>
> emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions leads to:
>
> ===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed:
> Upgrade virtualbox-ose-additions-5.1.8 to virtualbox-ose-additions-5.1.10
> Install devel/kBuild
> Install lang/gcc6
> Install textproc/flex
>
> and lang/gcc6 tries to build during devel/kBuild and the 3
> non-lang/gcc6 items above have:
>
> # grep -i gcc emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions/Makefile devel/kBuild/Makefile textproc/flex/Makefile
> emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions/Makefile:CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --nofatal --with-gcc="${CC}" --with-g++="${CXX}"
> emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions/Makefile: @${ECHO} 'VBOX_GCC_std = -std=c++11' >> ${WRKSRC}/LocalConfig.kmk
> emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions/Makefile: @${ECHO} 'VBOX_GCC_Wno-unused-parameter = -Wno-unused-parameter' >> \
> devel/kBuild/Makefile:USE_GCC= any
> devel/kBuild/Makefile: ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|gcc|${CC}|g' $$f ; \
>
> In a context with:
>
> # pkg info | grep -i gcc
> gcc6-devel-6.2.1.s20161201 GNU Compiler Collection 6
> powerpc64-gcc-6.2.0 Cross GNU Compiler Collection for powerpc64
> powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc-0.1 Pre seeded toolchain to cross build FreeBSD base
>
> # more /etc/make.conf
> WANT_QT_VERBOSE_CONFIGURE=1
> #
> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.24
> WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/portswork
> WITH_DEBUG=
> WITH_DEBUG_FILES=
> MALLOC_PRODUCTION=
>
>
> So apparently lang/gcc6-devel can not substitute for lang/gcc6
> automatically.
>
>
>
> Now that devel/powerpc64-gcc is 6.2.0 based it and lang/gcc6 may also
> conflict (I do not know yet: build in progress).
>
>
>
> ===
> Mark Millard
> markmi at dsl-only.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LSU.2.20.1612111035520.2333>