From owner-freebsd-current Fri Aug 16 00:35:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA14859 for current-outgoing; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 00:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viking.ucsalf.ac.uk (viking.ucsalf.ac.uk [192.195.1.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA14854 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 00:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by viking.ucsalf.ac.uk (Smail3.1.29.1 #4) id m0urJR3-00036xC; Fri, 16 Aug 96 08:35 BST Message-Id: From: mark@plato.ucsalf.ac.uk (Mark Powell) Subject: Re: Opinions? NT VS UNIX, NT SUCKS SOMETIMES To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: 16 Aug 1996 08:35:11 +0100 X-Gated-To-News-By: news@ucsalf.ac.uk Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In article <4tp2d0$m5s@viking.ucsalf.ac.uk>, Terry Lambert wrote: >In the registry: > >My Computer\ > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ > SOFTWARE\ > Microsoft\ > Windows\ > CurrentVersion\ > RunServices > >Edit > New -> String Value > MyAgent "C:\path_to_my-agent.exe" > >Will start a program each time the NT system starts. It's a bit more >flexible than editing /etc/rc* on BSD. That's meant to be sarcastic, right? NT more flexible than BSD, in *any* way? I've used UNIX, Netware and NT. I don't think the latter can really claim to be a NOS. Probably forget the N there as well. -- Mark Powell - Senior Network Technician - Room: C806 Computer Services Unit, University College Salford, Salford, Manchester, UK. Tel: +44 161 745 3376 Fax: +44 161 736 3596 Email: mark@ucsalf.ac.uk finger mark@ucsalf.ac.uk (for PGP key) Home Page