From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 18:18:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D414237B401; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8ADA43F85; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:18:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com ([192.168.0.5]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h3A1ItBG090825; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 21:18:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:17:27 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Sean Chittenden Message-Id: <20030410091727.3395487a.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030410005533.GZ79923@perrin.int.nxad.com> References: <200304092345.h39Njx9K066928@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030410082006.2f4f748b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030410005533.GZ79923@perrin.int.nxad.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en Makefile www/en/conspectus Makefile Makefile.inc README index.sgml www/en/conspectus/advocacy Makefile Makefile.inc www/en/conspectus/advocacy/2000 Makefile Makefile.inc index.sgml www/en/conspectus/advocacy/2000/11 05.sgml 12.sgml ... X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 01:18:59 -0000 On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 17:55:33 -0700 Sean Chittenden wrote: > > [SNIP] > > > > > The conspectus was well intentioned, but hasn't been touched in three > > > years. If someone feels passionately about these bits and wants to > > > ressurect summarizing hot topics/discussions (similar to what PostgreSQL > > > or Ruby does for their weekly news), so be it, but this content is just > > > too dated to be of any use. > > > > > > > Where was this discussed? I don't remember ever reading a thread > > about this. > > Only nudged in private by Ceri to finish the job. I was going to wait > a week to see if anyone kibitzed about me removing the link from the > support page, but patience got the better of me and I nuked the files > because they were dated ~2000 and the content was completely out of > date/useless for "modern" FreeBSD users. -sc > > -- > Sean Chittenden > Well I am upset, but for reasons not related to FreeBSD. I'll discuss this later. Just wish it was more openly discussed, perhaps requesting someone work on it. -- Tom Rhodes