Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 18:09:59 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Cc: Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r283424 - in head/sys: amd64/linux modules/linux64 Message-ID: <3477965.eCK5d68YxY@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <20150525172734.GR21070@zxy.spb.ru> References: <201505241607.t4OG7C7b073936@svn.freebsd.org> <1834151.lrAIDRMoJM@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20150525172734.GR21070@zxy.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, May 25, 2015 08:27:34 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:32:41PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Monday, May 25, 2015 06:13:39 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:40:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > > > Some other related questions are: can we revive print/acroread now and or > > > > use a 64-bit flash plugin after these changes? > > > > > > I am still use print/acroread. > > > As I know removing print/acroread irrelevant to linuxator. > > > This is will by security reasson. > > > I am don't open suspicious pdf from suspicious source and just ignore > > > this removing. > > > > I mean more if these updates allow us to update to a newer version of > > print/acroread that would no longer be vulnerable (if such a thing exists) > > whether 32- or 64-bit. > > Currenly I don't see any linux in Acrobat Reader support OS: https://get.adobe.com/reader/otherversions/ Humm, it seems it was pulled last year. :-/ -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3477965.eCK5d68YxY>