From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 25 23:15:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC3516A4CE; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:15:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F4943D2F; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:15:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7PNExXF005402; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:14:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:15:23 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040825.171523.10602123.imp@bsdimp.com> To: nate@root.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <412D1CE6.3050603@root.org> References: <20040825222345.GB79209@ip.net.ua> <20040825.163130.66167637.imp@bsdimp.com> <412D1CE6.3050603@root.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No more floppy drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:15:27 -0000 In message: <412D1CE6.3050603@root.org> Nate Lawson writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <20040825222345.GB79209@ip.net.ua> : > Ruslan Ermilov writes: : > : On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:17:33PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > : > Generally one doesn't want ANY hints when one has pnpisabios or acpi : > : > supplying the hints, unless one really does have an exceptional device : > : > at that location. : > : > : > : A lot of current@ users report missing /dev/fd0 due to this. Can this : > : be fixed somehow? : > : > acpi should be providing these hints, but it appears that either that : > code isn't working, hasn't been committed or there's no fallback to : > more traditional methods when there's no information about fd drives. : > This is one of the twistiest, nastiest, ugliest part of PCAT :-( : : The code I added merely does: : : if (_FDE working) : add fd[0-2] children accordingly : if (fdX._FDI working) : set type on fdX : else : unmodified hints probe for fd[0-2] : : if (fdX type not set) : unmodified drive type probe via rtc : : Since the probe is unmodified if _FDE is not present, I can't see a new : problem here. If this is a new problem, it must be elsewhere. I'll take a look at things. I think it may have to do with presence/absence things. Warner