Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:57:30 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/djvulibre Makefile ports/textproc/wordnet Makefile Message-ID: <1121443050.92732.41.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <200507151751.30130.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <200507132352.j6DNqtUS011697@repoman.freebsd.org> <200507151635.10756.lofi@freebsd.org> <20050715172610.9n4mfl8oxogsk8w4@netchild.homeip.net> <200507151751.30130.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-xC1OVItfqovVs9kK67sp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Michael Nottebrock p=ED=B9e v p=E1 15. 07. 2005 v 17:51 +0200:
> On Friday, 15. July 2005 17:26, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Michael Nottebrock <lofi@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > >> Oh? Cluster does compile new package when PKGNAME changes.
> > >
> > > Does it really now? That's broken. The right thing would be to track =
file
> > > modifications timestamps ...
> >
> > Not every change makes it necessary to rebuild the package, e.g. a chan=
ge
> > to MASTER_SITE does not have to result in a rebuild of the package (if =
the
> > package isn't there because it wasn't fetchable before, the cluster DTR=
T).
>=20
> It would be better to err on the safe side there instead of having to bum=
p=20
> PORTREVISION for the cluster's sake. After all, the cluster doesn't mind =
a=20
> few gratuitous rebuilds too much - ports users do, especially those with=20
> slower machines.
These PORTREVISION bumps are here mainly for the users. Because, when a
library raises it's major version number, you need to relink all C
binaries linked against the old copy of the library...
PORTREVISION bumps together with common usage of portupgrade helps this
very nicely.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
> Why do we need a film of "Lord of the Rings" when we have the book?
Because watching a cg enhanced Legolas fire a flaming arrow
into the heart of a warg is cool?
- asdf@asdf.com in rec.games.roguelike.angband
--=-xC1OVItfqovVs9kK67sp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBC19zqntdYP8FOsoIRAqKnAJ0SpGIkVKGPRkRMzIIfbbnTr2tr+gCeOydD
JGddT1ZW+UE2MHQU5L+JOOM=
=x2hZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-xC1OVItfqovVs9kK67sp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1121443050.92732.41.camel>