From owner-freebsd-security Fri Apr 17 12:46:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA13159 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 12:46:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [198.78.58.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA13146 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 19:46:46 GMT (envelope-from fullermd@futuresouth.com) Received: from localhost (fullermd@localhost) by shell.futuresouth.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA28918; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 14:46:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 14:46:26 -0500 (CDT) From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel permissions In-Reply-To: <12444.892832647@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk [trim trim trim on cc] On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > If we could just get the WIDE people and the INRIA people (and the NRL > > people) to all coalesce around a single solution, we'd have a clear > > winner. > > Of course, the odds of that ever happening are probably equivalent to > that of the moon suddenly flying out of its orbit, so what would you > propose instead? We just can't keep sitting on the fence and doing > nothing about this forever, can we? Heck, that's easy. Just go with the highest bidder (who'll pay us the most to use theirs ;) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* | FreeBSD; the way computers were meant to be | * "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is * | that I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet."| * fullermd@futuresouth.com :-} MAtthew Fuller * | http://keystone.westminster.edu/~fullermd | *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message