From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 5 09:51:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5265875 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@gid0.org) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD79D8FC08 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id b5so5019181lbd.13 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 01:51:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=HA4EvP54J9lsbSHh/em1g37xhLII0frrkkH2ytO+S5c=; b=BgGtoz5xkxvNmoRxD7iqWFE4DmwAxyJikhI8WxlXH8gUZda+QopbOc8biwYKQ/uzA3 OXX/5BIT9zXFx5Y3YieII5whSIMOk68+soQ8SvUmM9bg9Knj1Jp5yc1UlQ/Qut6pbo5e VHLCjFyqIl9D51V1dfyd7XaF3AxPnhtmxuSVPHjqf2bLTeD39F+xiBFU604NY42hgbUP ocQL6dPZVf/ewuVEP+UOxW3ZFnBEDFinbxwRQaZuVT44X49DxRyIr3fJ/StKoA1xsD9x Egh4GK9iumN6ZL2aGb+qtz0ORnXrauyg8R3phMpZoPY6Mxe5pv1fsgr3I8hWth7dIS9J vO2w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.47.228 with SMTP id g4mr3536389lbn.21.1352109070511; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 01:51:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.135.137 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 01:51:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20121103232433.00005eee@unknown> <5095ACC7.1050002@FreeBSD.org> <20121104225529.000028a9@unknown> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:51:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Do we have a CPUTYPE=native and/or generic stability problem? From: Olivier Smedts To: Alexander Leidinger X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsIe3jf7qbQV3Z7zozTC9iVvIGPO7fbvj6CQ0shzGu4iKU6D91F4dXd0ZeaL2jaiR9oPlv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Dimitry Andric , "current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:51:12 -0000 Le lundi 5 novembre 2012, Olivier Smedts a =E9crit : > > Le lundi 5 novembre 2012, Olivier Smedts a =E9crit : > >> >> Le dimanche 4 novembre 2012, Alexander Leidinger a =E9crit : > > >> >> The machine has 12 MB RAM (no swap configured), after nearly a day >>> uptime it looks like this: >>> >>> ---snip--- >>> Mem: 348M Active, 599M Inact, 9281M Wired, 264K Cache, 1548M Free >>> ARC: 7117M Total, 1607M MRU, 3996M MFU, 934K Anon, 208M Header, 1307M >>> Other >>> ---snip--- >>> >>> I would not expect an internal compiler error when I run out of RAM. >> >> Not related, but I think you should configure >> > ...at least a little swap (sorry, damn "smart"-phone). When under memory > pressure, ZFS sometimes don't have time to evict ARC memory and some MBs > are written to swap instead of waiting. No real technical details > ...here, I'll leave it to ZFS or VM gurus, but I always have few dozens of MBs of my swap used even if I have lots of memory. And I promise my next reply will be made on a real computer, not on a too small touch interface with an editor which tries to replace all your english words by some of your mother tongue words. Sorry for triple posting. --=20 Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: olivier@gid0.org - against HTML email & vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."