From owner-freebsd-commit Fri Sep 29 12:45:51 1995 Return-Path: owner-commit Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA28791 for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 12:45:51 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA28777 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 12:45:47 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA28767 for cvs-sbin-outgoing; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 12:45:44 -0700 Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA28759 ; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 12:45:40 -0700 Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA19773; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 15:44:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 15:44:59 -0400 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" Message-Id: <9509291944.AA19773@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" , CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin Makefile In-Reply-To: <199509291938.MAA24705@aslan.cdrom.com> References: <199509291935.MAA28395@freefall.freebsd.org> <199509291938.MAA24705@aslan.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > On a similar subject, shouldn't "MAKE_EBONES" go away? Shouldn't the > build be based solely on the existance of the directory? No, certainly not! How would you make no-crypto distributions, then? Or are you simply suggesting that everything should be controlled by a single option? -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant