From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  8 16:05:15 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDA237B4CB
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  8 Aug 2003 16:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E1443FD7
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  8 Aug 2003 16:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[66.30.200.37])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <2003080823051301100cgcrne>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 23:05:13 +0000
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37]
	(may be forged))
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h78N5CKS029359;
	Fri, 8 Aug 2003 19:05:12 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: (from lowell@localhost)
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h78N5CrA029356;
	Fri, 8 Aug 2003 19:05:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to
	freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f
Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com
To: WebDenis <webdenis@inbox.ru>
References: <200308090259.11068.webdenis@inbox.ru>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
Date: 08 Aug 2003 19:05:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200308090259.11068.webdenis@inbox.ru>
Message-ID: <44ekzvda3b.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: I think that FreeBSD 5.1 bad version....
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 23:05:15 -0000

WebDenis <webdenis@inbox.ru> writes:

> How do u think, FreeBSD 5.1 better then 4.8 stable?
> I think that all of my problem was only from 5.1 And i think that 4.8 better 
> then 5.1.... maybe I think wrong?

This depends on how you're measuring "better".  After all, 4.8 is the
release currently recommended for production applications.  
Read 
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/early-adopter.html
if you haven't already...