From owner-freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Wed Jun 24 16:23:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D503916B39 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA7511D6 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EB199916B38; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perl@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA994916B37 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAD6311D5 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7nSq-000Hvj-Gd for perl@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:23:52 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:23:52 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR Message-ID: <20150624162352.GV49099@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:23:54 -0000 Hi! > Wow you're not kidding... now that I'm testing it out there are > tons that don't fetch without MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR. Would it be useful to ask the CPAN folks why it is like this and get it fixed upstream ? Does anyone have contacts there ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !