From owner-freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Mon Aug 29 18:38:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B402BC7F0A for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julio@meroh.net) Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FD4C21DF for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julio@meroh.net) Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l2so147275370qkf.3 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:38:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=meroh.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HiClflj39J38sAoyEORmOMyPXl4h5AQu36E8R6D0Zas=; b=aqbTFl2Ikg17W8iScg8eL9jwNySKvc4nY8BupgW0e5L7IrDkH65tY6DgkBjPOhM164 JPlUP4EJW680jjcWSihpr7UrdwTxApPgyTPcXdMpNOHL6tCXW7mUrrrfGjJQiWludJCM ljewEG+2JfFRg3T127YKHMCInUdl/ax20SScJ/tz0ghq5xvZscLErZauYtlCNJhfYtiH NNsyFbQ7qE3SZ8s//0uDgmCfb/n2jEtF6vmeoEF5EpqFHWlsmllWIqCUjAavQN9r4bKw w0CHeCJwwSqXV3cxF5/8vPl3XHjcSE19LZ01QJx1DP+zWQrbXLu1+faPwcVGYfOYmO7J TnOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HiClflj39J38sAoyEORmOMyPXl4h5AQu36E8R6D0Zas=; b=YfjWXuvvWS591R36Eaau0GWhaFQi0uKM39bixC64/wQD0LYW5mv9OeC/y4knThex/H 1reUOIiZAq5iCQDuYpCCxKz3Me4Vp59fiN1ujAKW4pCy+0CA6Oq4zYBuNwbbwWgno1GL 3FQP3+dMPqg/stkk7aQVEdMnzWIRunBVpaL6WbdggY2kOhgFKmS9UZ2HZ2E/KOEOjU/8 9VbQ91sJIKuZzZRwa30xirArsN0cJEWdeyHswbH94aprf7fbALdbdT/PzeawqpcDsrRq I/4qbNHCz5z+pCLIZnDLqRt6ltZNnxcCz6rXJqRnr2WZx5NK6yDBmfjcwy7qxmZqjCeY LUIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNmlcc2T4Y/aaE9flCQPYMNZZFNYQsGz8oMNBUFL/WdQRwr4sKAobig6YbYE6o0FntLjeY2/O72hLfcwQ== X-Received: by 10.55.26.154 with SMTP id l26mr19536522qkh.224.1472495928239; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:38:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.237.55.202 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:38:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2620:0:1003:415:bd00:554d:a06c:542b] In-Reply-To: References: <1491374121.44.1472440150670.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> <166099893.51.1472451061454.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> <6E443BB8-0269-4812-A2F4-40AA303E69C6@FreeBSD.org> <8058052E-A09A-403E-828A-74B51ED4BBF4@FreeBSD.org> <20160829163911.GA51650@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> <4b8980f0-1a90-40d7-45b3-9569b321d1c6@FreeBSD.org> <20160829175247.GA10263@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> <31f11ba3-ca29-0f85-f1c1-6a3cd467bb57@FreeBSD.org> <67E84707-3267-49F3-8DB6-13CBD05B1690@gmail.com> <3B60A57F-778C-4E7C-B081-098C0F6E92D2@gmail.com> <5485945b-6539-5ed0-c089-5537d6bd70a9@FreeBSD.org> From: Julio Merino Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:38:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_HEAD #564 To: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" Cc: Bryan Drewery , "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" , Dimitry Andric , "jenkins-admin@freebsd.org" , Li-Wen Hsu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:38:49 -0000 On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) < yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 29, 2016, at 11:20, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > > > Trust me, you're wasting your time, this is not the problem. If it wer= e > > then _nothing_ would compile from the /usr/bin/cc compiler. It's only = a > > problem with running the ATF tests which means it is likely storing the > > flags it is built with somewhere and reusing them. > > Then it=E2=80=99s potentially this variable (from lib/atf/libatf-c/Makefi= le ): > > CFLAGS+=3D -DATF_BUILD_CFLAGS=3D'"${_CFLAGS}=E2=80=9D=E2=80=99 > > I=E2=80=99ll look through the Jenkins logs to confirm the CFLAGS that get= passed > in to lib/atf. > Yes. If we ought to not use any of those flags at run-time (and we should not, as Bryan pointed out), then yes, the problem is in the setting of ATF_BUILD_CFLAGS et. al. --=20 Julio Merino -- http://julio.meroh.net/