From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 22:50:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D10F106566C; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB4D8FC0C; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id E5A5F1A3D01; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:50:29 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav Message-ID: <20090922225029.GP21946@elvis.mu.org> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <4AB7ED76.5010406@FreeBSD.org> <20090922082344.GA64877@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <37B47737-E4A4-4CF3-9DAA-B0F0A4CC8901@van-laarhoven.org> <86d45i1wl3.fsf@ds4.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86d45i1wl3.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Nick Hibma , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:50:30 -0000 * Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav [090922 14:47] wrote: > Nick Hibma writes: > > Our package system is a tremendous asset, and wholeheartedly agree > > with Doug on this. So my vote is now a -1. Not that anyone cares. > > Having seen how it turned out, I'd like to vote -50,000,000 on this > whole discussion... Surely we're not done until someone suggests replacing /bin/sh with bash, amirite? -- - Alfred Perlstein .- AMA, VMOA #5191, 03 vmax, 92 gs500, 85 ch250 .- FreeBSD committer