From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 23 12:13:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (sol.cc.u-szeged.hu [160.114.8.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9135B1538B for ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:13:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu) Received: from petra.hos.u-szeged.hu by sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (8.9.1b+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id VAA17936; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 21:11:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from sziszi by petra.hos.u-szeged.hu with local-smtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 11qM3V-0000lb-00; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:56:49 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 20:56:49 +0100 (CET) From: Adam Szilveszter To: Brad Knowles Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 1:51 PM -0500 1999/11/23, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > Then, may be, that's not what's needed? The > > 64Mb problems, AFAIR, was only addressed after some magazine benchmarked > > FreeBSD against Linux on a 128Mb machine and we sucked because we were > > only using 64Mb... > > You mean this problem has actually been fixed? Can I remove the > MAXMEM definitions on the kernel configurations for my Dell PowerEdge > 1300 servers? > > Cool! Hi! I do not know for sure but I think it still exists on 3.x... at least many people reported about it even recently... I only have 64M, and that amount is detected (as it should). Cheers! Szilveszter ADAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Adam Szilveszter * JATE Szeged * email: sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu * * Homepage : none * alternate email: cc@flanker.itl.net.ua * * Finger sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu for PGP key. * * I prefer using the door instead of Windows(tm)... * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message