From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 29 7:35:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2615337B423; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veager.siteplus.net (1Cust36.tnt9.chattanooga.tn.da.uu.net [63.39.120.36]) by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3-EL_1_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA17391; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:35:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks To: James Wyatt Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, John Turner , Andy Wolf , Jan Knepper Subject: RE: DNS: having domain1.com and domain1.net point to the same IP. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, James Wyatt wrote: > Must not have to renumber things very often is my guess... If there are > multiple 'CNAME's pointing to an 'A', then you only have *one* address to > renumber and percolate through the planetary DNSs. I host various > functions for several domains and 'CNAME's have been my friend. I try not > to use 'MX's point to 'CNAME's, however, as that *has* caused problems. I > am *amazed* at the number of MTAs that try 'A's even though 'MX's exist. > > 'CNAME's are not inherently evil in themselves, but some are misused - Jy@ Point well taken. It came into focus when you said "planetary DNSs". I have also noticed mail following the A record trail. *Problems* may be too conservative a word :/ Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message