From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 16 6: 8:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from kalaid.f2f.com.ua (kalaid.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE77737B403 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:08:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Mail-In.Net (borey.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.24]) by kalaid.f2f.com.ua (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f6GD9nj78440; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:09:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vega.vega.com (root@[212.35.189.197]) by Mail-In.Net (8.11.3/8.H.Z) with ESMTP id f6GD8Hu30224; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:08:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6GD73D48026; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:07:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3B52E709.6514DEC1@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:07:21 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: Jun Kuriyama , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PORTREVISION bumps on dependency changes (Was: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/freetype2 Makefile) References: <200107121008.f6CA8iN37556@freefall.freebsd.org> <7mg0c05n3h.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <3B52CDFB.C125416@FreeBSD.org> <7mae253xxw.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20010716134702.C10331@mithrandr.moria.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Mon 2001-07-16 (20:39), Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > At Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:20:27 +0300, > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > I have already done it several minutes after upgrading freetype2. > > > > Ah, sorry. I missed that. > > > > BTW, is it reasonable to bump PORTREVISION for that case? > > If the dependencies change you _should_ bump PORTREVISION. If you bump > a library, you _must_ bump PORTREVISION on the dependencies. Nope, you shouldn't do it - it would be poinless. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message