From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 11 15:03:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE94B106564A; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0F78FC14; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oagm1 with SMTP id m1so392230oag.13 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:03:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GG7e1UssJZxrAUpjbZuAez/uBnaGD0W6n33feZ9R3CA=; b=xwuU/f2r4gGuhvzrI1Ha04a+EbV4N8O1sOk7dPMSs7Vux8wpHI97poDC9TLLyS+sCL 9xchkjOxLlNqRSIy/5bqjVk3t+Ntd7eeRUUXabz4pxHeLpkg9zJcqKeU3QrmhovEn3lv LIGKwTK78sNEDaP+Oq4hwrnFVEhaAElRqsZuTAfFBDzXRDbzNmHuil7yx6jShxqRcU8P FViLcNqP3OGPkR3UG14OkHgMxdA79XIbFVn81hz5zolSdO5lo79/MRnqwSF1IsamvSo7 E6ik0viPx+M4UaMmQTUNiRvJSEDEzjCsal/dTG3lGtish3eaQMJ9D8i18/AZhl0FisLf WAvA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.52.42 with SMTP id q10mr18567927obo.46.1347375795171; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.97.168 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:03:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120911122122.GJ37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911122122.GJ37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:03:15 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger To: Konstantin Belousov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:03:16 -0000 On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Can you, please, read what I wrote ? Fixing _ports_ to compile with > clang is plain wrong. Upstream developers use gcc almost always for > development and testing. Establishing another constant cost on the > porting work puts burden on the ports submitters, maintainers and even > ports users. > > I do strongly oppose the attempt to drain the freebsd resources by > forcing porters to port third-party code to other compiler. I agree with this pretty much. I haven't done fix any of port build with clang as I simply ignore clang (sorry). When user report to me and I tell them to stick with GCC as I don't support it. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org