From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 26 14:10:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7994982 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7AA8FC0C for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAQEA1BO078631 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qAQEA1hm078630; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:10:01 GMT Message-Id: <201211261410.qAQEA1hm078630@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Stef Walter Subject: Re: ports/133081: [bsd.python.mk] PYEASYINSTALL_ARCHDEP=yes makes broken packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stef Walter List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:10:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/133081; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stef Walter To: Victor Balada Diaz Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/133081: [bsd.python.mk] PYEASYINSTALL_ARCHDEP=yes makes broken packages Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:59:39 +0100 On 11/16/2012 09:42 PM, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > I've just been beaten by this issue while installing sysutils/salt > from pkgng. Salt depends on py-m2crypto, which use PYEASYINSTALL_ARCHDEP. > > As pkgng makes using binary packages much easier, this problem will start > affecting more users as new releases start with it by default. > > Is there any update on fixing this issue? I got a lot of push back from upstream folks talking about how using distutils isn't the right way forward and so on and so forth. So I backed away and left this to be handled by someone more intimately involved. In many of my previous clients large deployments they've been using these patches for about 5 years now. Without them the way the architecture dependent python packages work is just broken. Cheers, Stef